kernel_xiaomi_sm8250

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Daniel Borkmann	a386fceed7	bpf: Fix pointer arithmetic mask tightening under state pruning commit e042aa532c84d18ff13291d00620502ce7a38dda upstream. In 7fedb63a8307 ("bpf: Tighten speculative pointer arithmetic mask") we narrowed the offset mask for unprivileged pointer arithmetic in order to mitigate a corner case where in the speculative domain it is possible to advance, for example, the map value pointer by up to value_size-1 out-of- bounds in order to leak kernel memory via side-channel to user space. The verifier's state pruning for scalars leaves one corner case open where in the first verification path R_x holds an unknown scalar with an aux->alu_limit of e.g. 7, and in a second verification path that same register R_x, here denoted as R_x', holds an unknown scalar which has tighter bounds and would thus satisfy range_within(R_x, R_x') as well as tnum_in(R_x, R_x') for state pruning, yielding an aux->alu_limit of 3: Given the second path fits the register constraints for pruning, the final generated mask from aux->alu_limit will remain at 7. While technically not wrong for the non-speculative domain, it would however be possible to craft similar cases where the mask would be too wide as in 7fedb63a8307. One way to fix it is to detect the presence of unknown scalar map pointer arithmetic and force a deeper search on unknown scalars to ensure that we do not run into a masking mismatch. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [OP: adjusted context for 4.19] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>	2021-09-22 11:47:59 +02:00
Lorenz Bauer	a4fe956b03	bpf: verifier: Allocate idmap scratch in verifier env commit c9e73e3d2b1eb1ea7ff068e05007eec3bd8ef1c9 upstream. func_states_equal makes a very short lived allocation for idmap, probably because it's too large to fit on the stack. However the function is called quite often, leading to a lot of alloc / free churn. Replace the temporary allocation with dedicated scratch space in struct bpf_verifier_env. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210429134656.122225-4-lmb@cloudflare.com [OP: adjusted context for 4.19] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>	2021-09-22 11:47:59 +02:00
Daniel Borkmann	8729685021	bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation commit 2039f26f3aca5b0e419b98f65dd36481337b86ee upstream. Spectre v4 gadgets make use of memory disambiguation, which is a set of techniques that execute memory access instructions, that is, loads and stores, out of program order; Intel's optimization manual, section 2.4.4.5: A load instruction micro-op may depend on a preceding store. Many microarchitectures block loads until all preceding store addresses are known. The memory disambiguator predicts which loads will not depend on any previous stores. When the disambiguator predicts that a load does not have such a dependency, the load takes its data from the L1 data cache. Eventually, the prediction is verified. If an actual conflict is detected, the load and all succeeding instructions are re-executed. `af86ca4e30` ("bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack") tried to mitigate this attack by sanitizing the memory locations through preemptive "fast" (low latency) stores of zero prior to the actual "slow" (high latency) store of a pointer value such that upon dependency misprediction the CPU then speculatively executes the load of the pointer value and retrieves the zero value instead of the attacker controlled scalar value previously stored at that location, meaning, subsequent access in the speculative domain is then redirected to the "zero page". The sanitized preemptive store of zero prior to the actual "slow" store is done through a simple ST instruction based on r10 (frame pointer) with relative offset to the stack location that the verifier has been tracking on the original used register for STX, which does not have to be r10. Thus, there are no memory dependencies for this store, since it's only using r10 and immediate constant of zero; hence `af86ca4e30` /assumed/ a low latency operation. However, a recent attack demonstrated that this mitigation is not sufficient since the preemptive store of zero could also be turned into a "slow" store and is thus bypassed as well: [...] // r2 = oob address (e.g. scalar) // r7 = pointer to map value 31: (7b) (u64 )(r10 -16) = r2 // r9 will remain "fast" register, r10 will become "slow" register below 32: (bf) r9 = r10 // JIT maps BPF reg to x86 reg: // r9 -> r15 (callee saved) // r10 -> rbp // train store forward prediction to break dependency link between both r9 // and r10 by evicting them from the predictor's LRU table. 33: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +24576) 34: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29696) = r0 35: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +24580) 36: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29700) = r0 37: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +24584) 38: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29704) = r0 39: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +24588) 40: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29708) = r0 [...] 543: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +25596) 544: (63) (u32 )(r7 +30716) = r0 // prepare call to bpf_ringbuf_output() helper. the latter will cause rbp // to spill to stack memory while r13/r14/r15 (all callee saved regs) remain // in hardware registers. rbp becomes slow due to push/pop latency. below is // disasm of bpf_ringbuf_output() helper for better visual context: // // ffffffff8117ee20: 41 54 push r12 // ffffffff8117ee22: 55 push rbp // ffffffff8117ee23: 53 push rbx // ffffffff8117ee24: 48 f7 c1 fc ff ff ff test rcx,0xfffffffffffffffc // ffffffff8117ee2b: 0f 85 af 00 00 00 jne ffffffff8117eee0 <-- jump taken // [...] // ffffffff8117eee0: 49 c7 c4 ea ff ff ff mov r12,0xffffffffffffffea // ffffffff8117eee7: 5b pop rbx // ffffffff8117eee8: 5d pop rbp // ffffffff8117eee9: 4c 89 e0 mov rax,r12 // ffffffff8117eeec: 41 5c pop r12 // ffffffff8117eeee: c3 ret 545: (18) r1 = map[id:4] 547: (bf) r2 = r7 548: (b7) r3 = 0 549: (b7) r4 = 4 550: (85) call bpf_ringbuf_output#194288 // instruction 551 inserted by verifier \ 551: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -16) = 0 \| /both/ are now slow stores here // storing map value pointer r7 at fp-16 \| since value of r10 is "slow". 552: (7b) (u64 )(r10 -16) = r7 / // following "fast" read to the same memory location, but due to dependency // misprediction it will speculatively execute before insn 551/552 completes. 553: (79) r2 = (u64 )(r9 -16) // in speculative domain contains attacker controlled r2. in non-speculative // domain this contains r7, and thus accesses r7 +0 below. 554: (71) r3 = (u8 )(r2 +0) // leak r3 As can be seen, the current speculative store bypass mitigation which the verifier inserts at line 551 is insufficient since /both/, the write of the zero sanitation as well as the map value pointer are a high latency instruction due to prior memory access via push/pop of r10 (rbp) in contrast to the low latency read in line 553 as r9 (r15) which stays in hardware registers. Thus, architecturally, fp-16 is r7, however, microarchitecturally, fp-16 can still be r2. Initial thoughts to address this issue was to track spilled pointer loads from stack and enforce their load via LDX through r10 as well so that /both/ the preemptive store of zero /as well as/ the load use the /same/ register such that a dependency is created between the store and load. However, this option is not sufficient either since it can be bypassed as well under speculation. An updated attack with pointer spill/fills now _all_ based on r10 would look as follows: [...] // r2 = oob address (e.g. scalar) // r7 = pointer to map value [...] // longer store forward prediction training sequence than before. 2062: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +25588) 2063: (63) (u32 )(r7 +30708) = r0 2064: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +25592) 2065: (63) (u32 )(r7 +30712) = r0 2066: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r7 +25596) 2067: (63) (u32 )(r7 +30716) = r0 // store the speculative load address (scalar) this time after the store // forward prediction training. 2068: (7b) (u64 )(r10 -16) = r2 // preoccupy the CPU store port by running sequence of dummy stores. 2069: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29696) = r0 2070: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29700) = r0 2071: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29704) = r0 2072: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29708) = r0 2073: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29712) = r0 2074: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29716) = r0 2075: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29720) = r0 2076: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29724) = r0 2077: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29728) = r0 2078: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29732) = r0 2079: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29736) = r0 2080: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29740) = r0 2081: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29744) = r0 2082: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29748) = r0 2083: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29752) = r0 2084: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29756) = r0 2085: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29760) = r0 2086: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29764) = r0 2087: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29768) = r0 2088: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29772) = r0 2089: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29776) = r0 2090: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29780) = r0 2091: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29784) = r0 2092: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29788) = r0 2093: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29792) = r0 2094: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29796) = r0 2095: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29800) = r0 2096: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29804) = r0 2097: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29808) = r0 2098: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29812) = r0 // overwrite scalar with dummy pointer; same as before, also including the // sanitation store with 0 from the current mitigation by the verifier. 2099: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -16) = 0 \| /both/ are now slow stores here 2100: (7b) (u64 )(r10 -16) = r7 \| since store unit is still busy. // load from stack intended to bypass stores. 2101: (79) r2 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 2102: (71) r3 = (u8 )(r2 +0) // leak r3 [...] Looking at the CPU microarchitecture, the scheduler might issue loads (such as seen in line 2101) before stores (line 2099,2100) because the load execution units become available while the store execution unit is still busy with the sequence of dummy stores (line 2069-2098). And so the load may use the prior stored scalar from r2 at address r10 -16 for speculation. The updated attack may work less reliable on CPU microarchitectures where loads and stores share execution resources. This concludes that the sanitizing with zero stores from `af86ca4e30` ("bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack") is insufficient. Moreover, the detection of stack reuse from `af86ca4e30` where previously data (STACK_MISC) has been written to a given stack slot where a pointer value is now to be stored does not have sufficient coverage as precondition for the mitigation either; for several reasons outlined as follows: 1) Stack content from prior program runs could still be preserved and is therefore not "random", best example is to split a speculative store bypass attack between tail calls, program A would prepare and store the oob address at a given stack slot and then tail call into program B which does the "slow" store of a pointer to the stack with subsequent "fast" read. From program B PoV such stack slot type is STACK_INVALID, and therefore also must be subject to mitigation. 2) The STACK_SPILL must not be coupled to register_is_const(&stack->spilled_ptr) condition, for example, the previous content of that memory location could also be a pointer to map or map value. Without the fix, a speculative store bypass is not mitigated in such precondition and can then lead to a type confusion in the speculative domain leaking kernel memory near these pointer types. While brainstorming on various alternative mitigation possibilities, we also stumbled upon a retrospective from Chrome developers [0]: [...] For variant 4, we implemented a mitigation to zero the unused memory of the heap prior to allocation, which cost about 1% when done concurrently and 4% for scavenging. Variant 4 defeats everything we could think of. We explored more mitigations for variant 4 but the threat proved to be more pervasive and dangerous than we anticipated. For example, stack slots used by the register allocator in the optimizing compiler could be subject to type confusion, leading to pointer crafting. Mitigating type confusion for stack slots alone would have required a complete redesign of the backend of the optimizing compiler, perhaps man years of work, without a guarantee of completeness. [...] >From BPF side, the problem space is reduced, however, options are rather limited. One idea that has been explored was to xor-obfuscate pointer spills to the BPF stack: [...] // preoccupy the CPU store port by running sequence of dummy stores. [...] 2106: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29796) = r0 2107: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29800) = r0 2108: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29804) = r0 2109: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29808) = r0 2110: (63) (u32 )(r7 +29812) = r0 // overwrite scalar with dummy pointer; xored with random 'secret' value // of 943576462 before store ... 2111: (b4) w11 = 943576462 2112: (af) r11 ^= r7 2113: (7b) (u64 )(r10 -16) = r11 2114: (79) r11 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 2115: (b4) w2 = 943576462 2116: (af) r2 ^= r11 // ... and restored with the same 'secret' value with the help of AX reg. 2117: (71) r3 = (u8 )(r2 +0) [...] While the above would not prevent speculation, it would make data leakage infeasible by directing it to random locations. In order to be effective and prevent type confusion under speculation, such random secret would have to be regenerated for each store. The additional complexity involved for a tracking mechanism that prevents jumps such that restoring spilled pointers would not get corrupted is not worth the gain for unprivileged. Hence, the fix in here eventually opted for emitting a non-public BPF_ST \| BPF_NOSPEC instruction which the x86 JIT translates into a lfence opcode. Inserting the latter in between the store and load instruction is one of the mitigations options [1]. The x86 instruction manual notes: [...] An LFENCE that follows an instruction that stores to memory might complete before the data being stored have become globally visible. [...] The latter meaning that the preceding store instruction finished execution and the store is at minimum guaranteed to be in the CPU's store queue, but it's not guaranteed to be in that CPU's L1 cache at that point (globally visible). The latter would only be guaranteed via sfence. So the load which is guaranteed to execute after the lfence for that local CPU would have to rely on store-to-load forwarding. [2], in section 2.3 on store buffers says: [...] For every store operation that is added to the ROB, an entry is allocated in the store buffer. This entry requires both the virtual and physical address of the target. Only if there is no free entry in the store buffer, the frontend stalls until there is an empty slot available in the store buffer again. Otherwise, the CPU can immediately continue adding subsequent instructions to the ROB and execute them out of order. On Intel CPUs, the store buffer has up to 56 entries. [...] One small upside on the fix is that it lifts constraints from `af86ca4e30` where the sanitize_stack_off relative to r10 must be the same when coming from different paths. The BPF_ST \| BPF_NOSPEC gets emitted after a BPF_STX or BPF_ST instruction. This happens either when we store a pointer or data value to the BPF stack for the first time, or upon later pointer spills. The former needs to be enforced since otherwise stale stack data could be leaked under speculation as outlined earlier. For non-x86 JITs the BPF_ST \| BPF_NOSPEC mapping is currently optimized away, but others could emit a speculation barrier as well if necessary. For real-world unprivileged programs e.g. generated by LLVM, pointer spill/fill is only generated upon register pressure and LLVM only tries to do that for pointers which are not used often. The program main impact will be the initial BPF_ST \| BPF_NOSPEC sanitation for the STACK_INVALID case when the first write to a stack slot occurs e.g. upon map lookup. In future we might refine ways to mitigate the latter cost. [0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05178.pdf [1] https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2018/05/21/analysis-and-mitigation-of-speculative-store-bypass-cve-2018-3639/ [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.05725.pdf Fixes: `af86ca4e30` ("bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack") Fixes: f7cf25b2026d ("bpf: track spill/fill of constants") Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [OP: - apply check_stack_write_fixed_off() changes in check_stack_write() - replace env->bypass_spec_v4 -> env->allow_ptr_leaks] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>	2021-09-22 11:47:59 +02:00
Edward Cree	228e64bdbb	bpf/verifier: per-register parent pointers commit 679c782de14bd48c19dd74cd1af20a2bc05dd936 upstream. By giving each register its own liveness chain, we elide the skip_callee() logic. Instead, each register's parent is the state it inherits from; both check_func_call() and prepare_func_exit() automatically connect reg states to the correct chain since when they copy the reg state across (r1-r5 into the callee as args, and r0 out as the return value) they also copy the parent pointer. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> [OP: adjusted context for 4.19] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>	2021-09-22 11:47:58 +02:00
Daniel Borkmann	bd9df99da9	bpf: Fix leakage of uninitialized bpf stack under speculation commit 801c6058d14a82179a7ee17a4b532cac6fad067f upstream. The current implemented mechanisms to mitigate data disclosure under speculation mainly address stack and map value oob access from the speculative domain. However, Piotr discovered that uninitialized BPF stack is not protected yet, and thus old data from the kernel stack, potentially including addresses of kernel structures, could still be extracted from that 512 bytes large window. The BPF stack is special compared to map values since it's not zero initialized for every program invocation, whereas map values /are/ zero initialized upon their initial allocation and thus cannot leak any prior data in either domain. In the non-speculative domain, the verifier ensures that every stack slot read must have a prior stack slot write by the BPF program to avoid such data leaking issue. However, this is not enough: for example, when the pointer arithmetic operation moves the stack pointer from the last valid stack offset to the first valid offset, the sanitation logic allows for any intermediate offsets during speculative execution, which could then be used to extract any restricted stack content via side-channel. Given for unprivileged stack pointer arithmetic the use of unknown but bounded scalars is generally forbidden, we can simply turn the register-based arithmetic operation into an immediate-based arithmetic operation without the need for masking. This also gives the benefit of reducing the needed instructions for the operation. Given after the work in 7fedb63a8307 ("bpf: Tighten speculative pointer arithmetic mask"), the aux->alu_limit already holds the final immediate value for the offset register with the known scalar. Thus, a simple mov of the immediate to AX register with using AX as the source for the original instruction is sufficient and possible now in this case. Reported-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>	2021-06-03 08:38:07 +02:00
Daniel Borkmann	eed84f94ff	bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths [ commit d3bd7413e0ca40b60cf60d4003246d067cafdeda upstream ] While 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") took care of rejecting alu op on pointer when e.g. pointer came from two different map values with different map properties such as value size, Jann reported that a case was not covered yet when a given alu op is used in both "ptr_reg += reg" and "numeric_reg += reg" from different branches where we would incorrectly try to sanitize based on the pointer's limit. Catch this corner case and reject the program instead. Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>	2019-01-31 08:14:41 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann	f92a819b4c	bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic [ commit 979d63d50c0c0f7bc537bf821e056cc9fe5abd38 upstream ] Jann reported that the original commit back in `b2157399cc` ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") was not sufficient to stop CPU from speculating out of bounds memory access: While `b2157399cc` only focussed on masking array map access for unprivileged users for tail calls and data access such that the user provided index gets sanitized from BPF program and syscall side, there is still a more generic form affected from BPF programs that applies to most maps that hold user data in relation to dynamic map access when dealing with unknown scalars or "slow" known scalars as access offset, for example: - Load a map value pointer into R6 - Load an index into R7 - Do a slow computation (e.g. with a memory dependency) that loads a limit into R8 (e.g. load the limit from a map for high latency, then mask it to make the verifier happy) - Exit if R7 >= R8 (mispredicted branch) - Load R0 = R6[R7] - Load R0 = R6[R0] For unknown scalars there are two options in the BPF verifier where we could derive knowledge from in order to guarantee safe access to the memory: i) While </>/<=/>= variants won't allow to derive any lower or upper bounds from the unknown scalar where it would be safe to add it to the map value pointer, it is possible through ==/!= test however. ii) another option is to transform the unknown scalar into a known scalar, for example, through ALU ops combination such as R &= <imm> followed by R \|= <imm> or any similar combination where the original information from the unknown scalar would be destroyed entirely leaving R with a constant. The initial slow load still precedes the latter ALU ops on that register, so the CPU executes speculatively from that point. Once we have the known scalar, any compare operation would work then. A third option only involving registers with known scalars could be crafted as described in [0] where a CPU port (e.g. Slow Int unit) would be filled with many dependent computations such that the subsequent condition depending on its outcome has to wait for evaluation on its execution port and thereby executing speculatively if the speculated code can be scheduled on a different execution port, or any other form of mistraining as described in [1], for example. Given this is not limited to only unknown scalars, not only map but also stack access is affected since both is accessible for unprivileged users and could potentially be used for out of bounds access under speculation. In order to prevent any of these cases, the verifier is now sanitizing pointer arithmetic on the offset such that any out of bounds speculation would be masked in a way where the pointer arithmetic result in the destination register will stay unchanged, meaning offset masked into zero similar as in array_index_nospec() case. With regards to implementation, there are three options that were considered: i) new insn for sanitation, ii) push/pop insn and sanitation as inlined BPF, iii) reuse of ax register and sanitation as inlined BPF. Option i) has the downside that we end up using from reserved bits in the opcode space, but also that we would require each JIT to emit masking as native arch opcodes meaning mitigation would have slow adoption till everyone implements it eventually which is counter-productive. Option ii) and iii) have both in common that a temporary register is needed in order to implement the sanitation as inlined BPF since we are not allowed to modify the source register. While a push / pop insn in ii) would be useful to have in any case, it requires once again that every JIT needs to implement it first. While possible, amount of changes needed would also be unsuitable for a -stable patch. Therefore, the path which has fewer changes, less BPF instructions for the mitigation and does not require anything to be changed in the JITs is option iii) which this work is pursuing. The ax register is already mapped to a register in all JITs (modulo arm32 where it's mapped to stack as various other BPF registers there) and used in constant blinding for JITs-only so far. It can be reused for verifier rewrites under certain constraints. The interpreter's tmp "register" has therefore been remapped into extending the register set with hidden ax register and reusing that for a number of instructions that needed the prior temporary variable internally (e.g. div, mod). This allows for zero increase in stack space usage in the interpreter, and enables (restricted) generic use in rewrites otherwise as long as such a patchlet does not make use of these instructions. The sanitation mask is dynamic and relative to the offset the map value or stack pointer currently holds. There are various cases that need to be taken under consideration for the masking, e.g. such operation could look as follows: ptr += val or val += ptr or ptr -= val. Thus, the value to be sanitized could reside either in source or in destination register, and the limit is different depending on whether the ALU op is addition or subtraction and depending on the current known and bounded offset. The limit is derived as follows: limit := max_value_size - (smin_value + off). For subtraction: limit := umax_value + off. This holds because we do not allow any pointer arithmetic that would temporarily go out of bounds or would have an unknown value with mixed signed bounds where it is unclear at verification time whether the actual runtime value would be either negative or positive. For example, we have a derived map pointer value with constant offset and bounded one, so limit based on smin_value works because the verifier requires that statically analyzed arithmetic on the pointer must be in bounds, and thus it checks if resulting smin_value + off and umax_value + off is still within map value bounds at time of arithmetic in addition to time of access. Similarly, for the case of stack access we derive the limit as follows: MAX_BPF_STACK + off for subtraction and -off for the case of addition where off := ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value. Subtraction is a special case for the masking which can be in form of ptr += -val, ptr -= -val, or ptr -= val. In the first two cases where we know that the value is negative, we need to temporarily negate the value in order to do the sanitation on a positive value where we later swap the ALU op, and restore original source register if the value was in source. The sanitation of pointer arithmetic alone is still not fully sufficient as is, since a scenario like the following could happen ... PTR += 0x1000 (e.g. K-based imm) PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON [...] ... which under speculation could end up as ... PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ] PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ] [...] ... and therefore still access out of bounds. To prevent such case, the verifier is also analyzing safety for potential out of bounds access under speculative execution. Meaning, it is also simulating pointer access under truncation. We therefore "branch off" and push the current verification state after the ALU operation with known 0 to the verification stack for later analysis. Given the current path analysis succeeded it is likely that the one under speculation can be pruned. In any case, it is also subject to existing complexity limits and therefore anything beyond this point will be rejected. In terms of pruning, it needs to be ensured that the verification state from speculative execution simulation must never prune a non-speculative execution path, therefore, we mark verifier state accordingly at the time of push_stack(). If verifier detects out of bounds access under speculative execution from one of the possible paths that includes a truncation, it will reject such program. Given we mask every reg-based pointer arithmetic for unprivileged programs, we've been looking into how it could affect real-world programs in terms of size increase. As the majority of programs are targeted for privileged-only use case, we've unconditionally enabled masking (with its alu restrictions on top of it) for privileged programs for the sake of testing in order to check i) whether they get rejected in its current form, and ii) by how much the number of instructions and size will increase. We've tested this by using Katran, Cilium and test_l4lb from the kernel selftests. For Katran we've evaluated balancer_kern.o, Cilium bpf_lxc.o and an older test object bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o and l4lb we've used test_l4lb.o as well as test_l4lb_noinline.o. We found that none of the programs got rejected by the verifier with this change, and that impact is rather minimal to none. balancer_kern.o had 13,904 bytes (1,738 insns) xlated and 7,797 bytes JITed before and after the change. Most complex program in bpf_lxc.o had 30,544 bytes (3,817 insns) xlated and 18,538 bytes JITed before and after and none of the other tail call programs in bpf_lxc.o had any changes either. For the older bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o object we found a small increase from 20,616 bytes (2,576 insns) and 12,536 bytes JITed before to 20,664 bytes (2,582 insns) and 12,558 bytes JITed after the change. Other programs from that object file had similar small increase. Both test_l4lb.o had no change and remained at 6,544 bytes (817 insns) xlated and 3,401 bytes JITed and for test_l4lb_noinline.o constant at 5,080 bytes (634 insns) xlated and 3,313 bytes JITed. This can be explained in that LLVM typically optimizes stack based pointer arithmetic by using K-based operations and that use of dynamic map access is not overly frequent. However, in future we may decide to optimize the algorithm further under known guarantees from branch and value speculation. Latter seems also unclear in terms of prediction heuristics that today's CPUs apply as well as whether there could be collisions in e.g. the predictor's Value History/Pattern Table for triggering out of bounds access, thus masking is performed unconditionally at this point but could be subject to relaxation later on. We were generally also brainstorming various other approaches for mitigation, but the blocker was always lack of available registers at runtime and/or overhead for runtime tracking of limits belonging to a specific pointer. Thus, we found this to be minimally intrusive under given constraints. With that in place, a simple example with sanitized access on unprivileged load at post-verification time looks as follows: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 282 [...] 28: (79) r1 = (u64 )(r7 +0) 29: (79) r2 = (u64 )(r7 +8) 30: (57) r1 &= 15 31: (79) r3 = (u64 )(r0 +4608) 32: (57) r3 &= 1 33: (47) r3 \|= 1 34: (2d) if r2 > r3 goto pc+19 35: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 \| 36: (1f) r11 -= r2 \| Dynamic sanitation for pointer 37: (4f) r11 \|= r2 \| arithmetic with registers 38: (87) r11 = -r11 \| containing bounded or known 39: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 \| scalars in order to prevent 40: (5f) r11 &= r2 \| out of bounds speculation. 41: (0f) r4 += r11 \| 42: (71) r4 = (u8 )(r4 +0) 43: (6f) r4 <<= r1 [...] For the case where the scalar sits in the destination register as opposed to the source register, the following code is emitted for the above example: [...] 16: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 17: (1f) r11 -= r2 18: (4f) r11 \|= r2 19: (87) r11 = -r11 20: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 21: (5f) r2 &= r11 22: (0f) r2 += r0 23: (61) r0 = (u32 )(r2 +0) [...] JIT blinding example with non-conflicting use of r10: [...] d5: je 0x0000000000000106 _ d7: mov 0x0(%rax),%edi \| da: mov $0xf153246,%r10d \| Index load from map value and e0: xor $0xf153259,%r10 \| (const blinded) mask with 0x1f. e7: and %r10,%rdi \|_ ea: mov $0x2f,%r10d \| f0: sub %rdi,%r10 \| Sanitized addition. Both use r10 f3: or %rdi,%r10 \| but do not interfere with each f6: neg %r10 \| other. (Neither do these instructions f9: sar $0x3f,%r10 \| interfere with the use of ax as temp fd: and %r10,%rdi \| in interpreter.) 100: add %rax,%rdi \|_ 103: mov 0x0(%rdi),%eax [...] Tested that it fixes Jann's reproducer, and also checked that test_verifier and test_progs suite with interpreter, JIT and JIT with hardening enabled on x86-64 and arm64 runs successfully. [0] Speculose: Analyzing the Security Implications of Speculative Execution in CPUs, Giorgi Maisuradze and Christian Rossow, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04084.pdf [1] A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and Defenses, Claudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Benjamin von Berg, Philipp Ortner, Frank Piessens, Dmitry Evtyushkin, Daniel Gruss, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.05441.pdf Fixes: `b2157399cc` ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>	2019-01-31 08:14:41 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann	333a31c89a	bpf: move {prev_,}insn_idx into verifier env [ commit c08435ec7f2bc8f4109401f696fd55159b4b40cb upstream ] Move prev_insn_idx and insn_idx from the do_check() function into the verifier environment, so they can be read inside the various helper functions for handling the instructions. It's easier to put this into the environment rather than changing all call-sites only to pass it along. insn_idx is useful in particular since this later on allows to hold state in env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx]. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>	2019-01-31 08:14:40 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann	d93080cdba	bpf: fix partial copy of map_ptr when dst is scalar commit 0962590e553331db2cc0aef2dc35c57f6300dbbe upstream. ALU operations on pointers such as scalar_reg += map_value_ptr are handled in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Problem is however that map_ptr and range in the register state share a union, so transferring state through dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range is just buggy as any new map_ptr in the dst_reg is then truncated (or null) for subsequent checks. Fix this by adding a raw member and use it for copying state over to dst_reg. Fixes: `f1174f77b5` ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>	2018-11-13 11:08:14 -08:00
David S. Miller	5b79c2af66	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net Lots of easy overlapping changes in the confict resolutions here. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2018-05-26 19:46:15 -04:00
Linus Torvalds	03250e1028	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net Pull networking fixes from David Miller: "Let's begin the holiday weekend with some networking fixes: 1) Whoops need to restrict cfg80211 wiphy names even more to 64 bytes. From Eric Biggers. 2) Fix flags being ignored when using kernel_connect() with SCTP, from Xin Long. 3) Use after free in DCCP, from Alexey Kodanev. 4) Need to check rhltable_init() return value in ipmr code, from Eric Dumazet. 5) XDP handling fixes in virtio_net from Jason Wang. 6) Missing RTA_TABLE in rtm_ipv4_policy[], from Roopa Prabhu. 7) Need to use IRQ disabling spinlocks in mlx4_qp_lookup(), from Jack Morgenstein. 8) Prevent out-of-bounds speculation using indexes in BPF, from Daniel Borkmann. 9) Fix regression added by AF_PACKET link layer cure, from Willem de Bruijn. 10) Correct ENIC dma mask, from Govindarajulu Varadarajan. 11) Missing config options for PMTU tests, from Stefano Brivio" * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (48 commits) ibmvnic: Fix partial success login retries selftests/net: Add missing config options for PMTU tests mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks enic: set DMA mask to 47 bit ppp: remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl ipv4: remove warning in ip_recv_error net : sched: cls_api: deal with egdev path only if needed vhost: synchronize IOTLB message with dev cleanup packet: fix reserve calculation net/mlx5: IPSec, Fix a race between concurrent sandbox QP commands net/mlx5e: When RXFCS is set, add FCS data into checksum calculation bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation net/mlx4: Fix irq-unsafe spinlock usage net: phy: broadcom: Fix bcm_write_exp() net: phy: broadcom: Fix auxiliary control register reads net: ipv4: add missing RTA_TABLE to rtm_ipv4_policy net/mlx4: fix spelling mistake: "Inrerface" -> "Interface" and rephrase message ibmvnic: Only do H_EOI for mobility events tuntap: correctly set SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE virtio-net: fix leaking page for gso packet during mergeable XDP ...	2018-05-25 19:54:42 -07:00
Daniel Borkmann	c93552c443	bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation While reviewing the verifier code, I recently noticed that the following two program variants in relation to tail calls can be loaded. Variant 1: # bpftool p d x i 15 0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 1: (18) r2 = map[id:5] 3: (05) goto pc+2 4: (18) r2 = map[id:6] 6: (b7) r3 = 7 7: (35) if r3 >= 0xa0 goto pc+2 8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 255 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: (b7) r0 = 1 11: (95) exit # bpftool m s i 5 5: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 4 memlock 4096B # bpftool m s i 6 6: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 160 memlock 4096B Variant 2: # bpftool p d x i 20 0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 1: (18) r2 = map[id:8] 3: (05) goto pc+2 4: (18) r2 = map[id:7] 6: (b7) r3 = 7 7: (35) if r3 >= 0x4 goto pc+2 8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 3 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: (b7) r0 = 1 11: (95) exit # bpftool m s i 8 8: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 160 memlock 4096B # bpftool m s i 7 7: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 4 memlock 4096B In both cases the index masking inserted by the verifier in order to control out of bounds speculation from a CPU via `b2157399cc` ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") seems to be incorrect in what it is enforcing. In the 1st variant, the mask is applied from the map with the significantly larger number of entries where we would allow to a certain degree out of bounds speculation for the smaller map, and in the 2nd variant where the mask is applied from the map with the smaller number of entries, we get buggy behavior since we truncate the index of the larger map. The original intent from commit `b2157399cc` is to reject such occasions where two or more different tail call maps are used in the same tail call helper invocation. However, the check on the BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON is never hit since we never poisoned the saved pointer in the first place! We do this explicitly for map lookups but in case of tail calls we basically used the tail call map in insn_aux_data that was processed in the most recent path which the verifier walked. Thus any prior path that stored a pointer in insn_aux_data at the helper location was always overridden. Fix it by moving the map pointer poison logic into a small helper that covers both BPF helpers with the same logic. After that in fixup_bpf_calls() the poison check is then hit for tail calls and the program rejected. Latter only happens in unprivileged case since this is the only occasion where a rewrite needs to happen, and where such rewrite is specific to the map (max_entries, index_mask). In the privileged case the rewrite is generic for the insn->imm / insn->code update so multiple maps from different paths can be handled just fine since all the remaining logic happens in the instruction processing itself. This is similar to the case of map lookups: in case there is a collision of maps in fixup_bpf_calls() we must skip the inlined rewrite since this will turn the generic instruction sequence into a non- generic one. Thus the patch_call_imm will simply update the insn->imm location where the bpf_map_lookup_elem() will later take care of the dispatch. Given we need this 'poison' state as a check, the information of whether a map is an unpriv_array gets lost, so enforcing it prior to that needs an additional state. In general this check is needed since there are some complex and tail call intensive BPF programs out there where LLVM tends to generate such code occasionally. We therefore convert the map_ptr rather into map_state to store all this w/o extra memory overhead, and the bit whether one of the maps involved in the collision was from an unpriv_array thus needs to be retained as well there. Fixes: `b2157399cc` ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>	2018-05-24 08:15:43 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	af86ca4e30	bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attack Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used and sanitize such patterns. 39: (bf) r3 = r10 40: (07) r3 += -216 41: (79) r8 = (u64 )(r7 +0) // slow read 42: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -72) = 0 // verifier inserts this instruction 43: (7b) (u64 )(r8 +0) = r3 // this store becomes slow due to r8 44: (79) r1 = (u64 )(r6 +0) // cpu speculatively executes this load 45: (71) r2 = (u8 )(r1 +0) // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte' // is now sanitized Above code after x86 JIT becomes: e5: mov %rbp,%rdx e8: add $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx ef: mov 0x0(%r13),%r14 f3: movq $0x0,-0x48(%rbp) fb: mov %rdx,0x0(%r14) ff: mov 0x0(%rbx),%rdi 103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>	2018-05-19 20:44:24 +02:00
Mathieu Malaterre	be2d04d11f	bpf: add __printf verification to bpf_verifier_vlog __printf is useful to verify format and arguments. ‘bpf_verifier_vlog’ function is used twice in verifier.c in both cases the caller function already uses the __printf gcc attribute. Remove the following warning, triggered with W=1: kernel/bpf/verifier.c:176:2: warning: function might be possible candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-05-17 00:49:17 +02:00
Jiong Wang	9c8105bd44	bpf: centre subprog information fields It is better to centre all subprog information fields into one structure. This structure could later serve as function node in call graph. Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-05-04 11:58:36 +02:00
Jiong Wang	f910cefa32	bpf: unify main prog and subprog Currently, verifier treat main prog and subprog differently. All subprogs detected are kept in env->subprog_starts while main prog is not kept there. Instead, main prog is implicitly defined as the prog start at 0. There is actually no difference between main prog and subprog, it is better to unify them, and register all progs detected into env->subprog_starts. This could also help simplifying some code logic. Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-05-04 11:58:35 +02:00
Martin KaFai Lau	77d2e05abd	bpf: Add bpf_verifier_vlog() and bpf_verifier_log_needed() The BTF (BPF Type Format) verifier needs to reuse the current BPF verifier log. Hence, it requires the following changes: (1) Expose log_write() in verifier.c for other users. Its name is renamed to bpf_verifier_vlog(). (2) The BTF verifier also needs to check 'log->level && log->ubuf && !bpf_verifier_log_full(log);' independently outside of the current log_write(). It is because the BTF verifier will do one-check before making multiple calls to btf_verifier_vlog to log the details of a type. Hence, this check is also re-factored to a new function bpf_verifier_log_needed(). Since it is re-factored, we can check it before va_start() in the current bpf_verifier_log_write() and verbose(). Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-03-26 09:58:17 +02:00
Martin KaFai Lau	b9193c1b61	bpf: Rename bpf_verifer_log bpf_verifer_log => bpf_verifier_log Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-03-26 09:58:17 +02:00
Quentin Monnet	430e68d10b	bpf: export function to write into verifier log buffer Rename the BPF verifier `verbose()` to `bpf_verifier_log_write()` and export it, so that other components (in particular, drivers for BPF offload) can reuse the user buffer log to dump error messages at verification time. Renaming `verbose()` was necessary in order to avoid a name so generic to be exported to the global namespace. However to prevent too much pain for backports, the calls to `verbose()` in the kernel BPF verifier were not changed. Instead, use function aliasing to make `verbose` point to `bpf_verifier_log_write`. Another solution could consist in making a wrapper around `verbose()`, but since it is a variadic function, I don't see a clean way without creating two identical wrappers, one for the verifier and one to export. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2018-01-10 13:49:36 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski	cae1927c0b	bpf: offload: allow netdev to disappear while verifier is running To allow verifier instruction callbacks without any extra locking NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification would wait on a waitqueue for verifier to finish. This design decision was made when rtnl lock was providing all the locking. Use the read/write lock instead and remove the workqueue. Verifier will now call into the offload code, so dev_ops are moved to offload structure. Since verifier calls are all under bpf_prog_is_dev_bound() we no longer need static inline implementations to please builds with CONFIG_NET=n. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-31 16:12:23 +01:00
David S. Miller	fcffe2edbd	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-28 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your net-next tree. The main changes are: 1) Fix incorrect state pruning related to recognition of zero initialized stack slots, where stacksafe exploration would mistakenly return a positive pruning verdict too early ignoring other slots, from Gianluca. 2) Various BPF to BPF calls related follow-up fixes. Fix an off-by-one in maximum call depth check, and rework maximum stack depth tracking logic to fix a bypass of the total stack size check reported by Jann. Also fix a bug in arm64 JIT where prog->jited_len was uninitialized. Addition of various test cases to BPF selftests, from Alexei. 3) Addition of a BPF selftest to test_verifier that is related to BPF to BPF calls which demonstrates a late caller stack size increase and thus out of bounds access. Fixed above in 2). Test case from Jann. 4) Addition of correlating BPF helper calls, BPF to BPF calls as well as BPF maps to bpftool xlated dump in order to allow for better BPF program introspection and debugging, from Daniel. 5) Fixing several bugs in BPF to BPF calls kallsyms handling in order to get it actually to work for subprogs, from Daniel. 6) Extending sparc64 JIT support for BPF to BPF calls and fix a couple of build errors for libbpf on sparc64, from David. 7) Allow narrower context access for BPF dev cgroup typed programs in order to adapt to LLVM code generation. Also adjust memlock rlimit in the test_dev_cgroup BPF selftest, from Yonghong. 8) Add netdevsim Kconfig entry to BPF selftests since test_offload.py relies on netdevsim device being available, from Jakub. 9) Reduce scope of xdp_do_generic_redirect_map() to being static, from Xiongwei. 10) Minor cleanups and spelling fixes in BPF verifier, from Colin. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-12-27 20:40:32 -05:00
Alexei Starovoitov	70a87ffea8	bpf: fix maximum stack depth tracking logic Instead of computing max stack depth for current call chain during the main verifier pass track stack depth of each function independently and after do_check() is done do another pass over all instructions analyzing depth of all possible call stacks. Fixes: `f4d7e40a5b` ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)") Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-27 18:36:23 +01:00
David S. Miller	fba961ab29	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net Lots of overlapping changes. Also on the net-next side the XDP state management is handled more in the generic layers so undo the 'net' nfp fix which isn't applicable in net-next. Include a necessary change by Jakub Kicinski, with log message: ==================== cls_bpf no longer takes care of offload tracking. Make sure netdevsim performs necessary checks. This fixes a warning caused by TC trying to remove a filter it has not added. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-12-22 11:16:31 -05:00
Alexei Starovoitov	bb7f0f989c	bpf: fix integer overflows There were various issues related to the limited size of integers used in the verifier: - `off + size` overflow in __check_map_access() - `off + reg->off` overflow in check_mem_access() - `off + reg->var_off.value` overflow or 32-bit truncation of `reg->var_off.value` in check_mem_access() - 32-bit truncation in check_stack_boundary() Make sure that any integer math cannot overflow by not allowing pointer math with large values. Also reduce the scope of "scalar op scalar" tracking. Fixes: `f1174f77b5` ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-21 02:15:41 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov	1c2a088a66	bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-17 20:34:36 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov	cc2b14d510	bpf: teach verifier to recognize zero initialized stack programs with function calls are often passing various pointers via stack. When all calls are inlined llvm flattens stack accesses and optimizes away extra branches. When functions are not inlined it becomes the job of the verifier to recognize zero initialized stack to avoid exploring paths that program will not take. The following program would fail otherwise: ptr = &buffer_on_stack; ptr = 0; ... func_call(.., ptr, ...) { if (..) ptr = bpf_map_lookup(); } ... if (ptr != 0) { // Access (ptr)->field is valid. // Without stack_zero tracking such (*ptr)->field access // will be rejected } since stack slots are no longer uniform invalid \| spill \| misc add liveness marking to all slots, but do it in 8 byte chunks. So if nothing was read or written in [fp-16, fp-9] range it will be marked as LIVE_NONE. If any byte in that range was read, it will be marked LIVE_READ and stacksafe() check will perform byte-by-byte verification. If all bytes in the range were written the slot will be marked as LIVE_WRITTEN. This significantly speeds up state equality comparison and reduces total number of states processed. before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2051 2003 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3287 3164 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1080 1080 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 24980 12361 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 34308 16605 bpf_netdev.o 15404 10962 bpf_overlay.o 7191 6679 Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-17 20:34:35 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov	f4d7e40a5b	bpf: introduce function calls (verification) Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function. To recognize such set of bpf functions the verifier does: 1. runs control flow analysis to detect function boundaries 2. proceeds with verification of all functions starting from main(root) function It recognizes that the stack of the caller can be accessed by the callee (if the caller passed a pointer to its stack to the callee) and the callee can store map_value and other pointers into the stack of the caller. 3. keeps track of the stack_depth of each function to make sure that total stack depth is still less than 512 bytes 4. disallows pointers to the callee stack to be stored into the caller stack, since they will be invalid as soon as the callee returns 5. to reuse all of the existing state_pruning logic each function call is considered to be independent call from the verifier point of view. The verifier pretends to inline all function calls it sees are being called. It stores the callsite instruction index as part of the state to make sure that two calls to the same callee from two different places in the caller will be different from state pruning point of view 6. more safety checks are added to liveness analysis Implementation details: . struct bpf_verifier_state is now consists of all stack frames that led to this function . struct bpf_func_state represent one stack frame. It consists of registers in the given frame and its stack . propagate_liveness() logic had a premature optimization where mark_reg_read() and mark_stack_slot_read() were manually inlined with loop iterating over parents for each register or stack slot. Undo this optimization to reuse more complex mark__read() logic . skip_callee() logic is not necessary from safety point of view, but without it mark__read() markings become too conservative, since after returning from the funciton call a read of r6-r9 will incorrectly propagate the read marks into callee causing inefficient pruning later . mark_*_read() logic is now aware of control flow which makes it more complex. In the future the plan is to rewrite liveness to be hierarchical. So that liveness can be done within basic block only and control flow will be responsible for propagation of liveness information along cfg and between calls. . tail_calls and ld_abs insns are not allowed in the programs with bpf-to-bpf calls . returning stack pointers to the caller or storing them into stack frame of the caller is not allowed Testing: . no difference in cilium processed_insn numbers . large number of tests follows in next patches Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-17 20:34:35 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov	cc8b0b92a1	bpf: introduce function calls (function boundaries) Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function. Since the beginning of bpf all bpf programs were represented as a single function and program authors were forced to use always_inline for all functions in their C code. That was causing llvm to unnecessary inflate the code size and forcing developers to move code to header files with little code reuse. With a bit of additional complexity teach verifier to recognize arbitrary function calls from one bpf function to another as long as all of functions are presented to the verifier as a single bpf program. New program layout: r6 = r1 // some code .. r1 = .. // arg1 r2 = .. // arg2 call pc+1 // function call pc-relative exit .. = r1 // access arg1 .. = r2 // access arg2 .. call pc+20 // second level of function call ... It allows for better optimized code and finally allows to introduce the core bpf libraries that can be reused in different projects, since programs are no longer limited by single elf file. With function calls bpf can be compiled into multiple .o files. This patch is the first step. It detects programs that contain multiple functions and checks that calls between them are valid. It splits the sequence of bpf instructions (one program) into a set of bpf functions that call each other. Calls to only known functions are allowed. In the future the verifier may allow calls to unresolved functions and will do dynamic linking. This logic supports statically linked bpf functions only. Such function boundary detection could have been done as part of control flow graph building in check_cfg(), but it's cleaner to separate function boundary detection vs control flow checks within a subprogram (function) into logically indepedent steps. Follow up patches may split check_cfg() further, but not check_subprogs(). Only allow bpf-to-bpf calls for root only and for non-hw-offloaded programs. These restrictions can be relaxed in the future. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-12-17 20:34:35 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov	c131187db2	bpf: fix branch pruning logic when the verifier detects that register contains a runtime constant and it's compared with another constant it will prune exploration of the branch that is guaranteed not to be taken at runtime. This is all correct, but malicious program may be constructed in such a way that it always has a constant comparison and the other branch is never taken under any conditions. In this case such path through the program will not be explored by the verifier. It won't be taken at run-time either, but since all instructions are JITed the malicious program may cause JITs to complain about using reserved fields, etc. To fix the issue we have to track the instructions explored by the verifier and sanitize instructions that are dead at run time with NOPs. We cannot reject such dead code, since llvm generates it for valid C code, since it doesn't do as much data flow analysis as the verifier does. Fixes: `17a5267067` ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-11-23 10:56:35 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski	1438019479	bpf: make bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep() static inline Header implementation of bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep() which is used if CONFIG_NET=n should be a static inline. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-11-21 00:37:35 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski	b37a530613	bpf: remove old offload/analyzer Thanks to the ability to load a program for a specific device, running verifier twice is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-11-05 22:26:20 +09:00
Jakub Kicinski	ab3f0063c4	bpf: offload: add infrastructure for loading programs for a specific netdev The fact that we don't know which device the program is going to be used on is quite limiting in current eBPF infrastructure. We have to reverse or limit the changes which kernel makes to the loaded bytecode if we want it to be offloaded to a networking device. We also have to invent new APIs for debugging and troubleshooting support. Make it possible to load programs for a specific netdev. This helps us to bring the debug information closer to the core eBPF infrastructure (e.g. we will be able to reuse the verifer log in device JIT). It allows device JITs to perform translation on the original bytecode. __bpf_prog_get() when called to get a reference for an attachment point will now refuse to give it if program has a device assigned. Following patches will add a version of that function which passes the expected netdev in. @type argument in __bpf_prog_get() is renamed to attach_type to make it clearer that it's only set on attachment. All calls to ndo_bpf are protected by rtnl, only verifier callbacks are not. We need a wait queue to make sure netdev doesn't get destroyed while verifier is still running and calling its driver. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-11-05 22:26:18 +09:00
Alexei Starovoitov	638f5b90d4	bpf: reduce verifier memory consumption the verifier got progressively smarter over time and size of its internal state grew as well. Time to reduce the memory consumption. Before: sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state) = 6520 After: sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state) = 896 It's done by observing that majority of BPF programs use little to no stack whereas verifier kept all of 512 stack slots ready always. Instead dynamically reallocate struct verifier state when stack access is detected. Runtime difference before vs after is within a noise. The number of processed instructions stays the same. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-11-01 11:41:18 +09:00
Jakub Kicinski	00176a34d9	bpf: remove the verifier ops from program structure Since the verifier ops don't have to be associated with the program for its entire lifetime we can move it to verifier's struct bpf_verifier_env. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-10-18 14:17:10 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski	a2a7d57010	bpf: write back the verifier log buffer as it gets filled Verifier log buffer can be quite large (up to 16MB currently). As Eric Dumazet points out if we allow multiple verification requests to proceed simultaneously, malicious user may use the verifier as a way of allocating large amounts of unswappable memory to OOM the host. Switch to a strategy of allocating a smaller buffer (1024B) and writing it out into the user buffer after every print. While at it remove the old BUG_ON(). This is in preparation of the global verifier lock removal. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-10-10 12:30:16 -07:00
Jakub Kicinski	61bd5218ee	bpf: move global verifier log into verifier environment The biggest piece of global state protected by the verifier lock is the verifier_log. Move that log to struct bpf_verifier_env. struct bpf_verifier_env has to be passed now to all invocations of verbose(). Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-10-10 12:30:16 -07:00
Jakub Kicinski	e7bf8249e8	bpf: encapsulate verifier log state into a structure Put the loose log_* variables into a structure. This will make it simpler to remove the global verifier state in following patches. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-10-10 12:30:16 -07:00
Edward Cree	8e9cd9ce90	bpf/verifier: document liveness analysis The liveness tracking algorithm is quite subtle; add comments to explain it. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-08-23 22:38:08 -07:00
Edward Cree	1b688a19a9	bpf/verifier: remove varlen_map_value_access flag The optimisation it does is broken when the 'new' register value has a variable offset and the 'old' was constant. I broke it with my pointer types unification (see Fixes tag below), before which the 'new' value would have type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ and would thus not compare equal; other changes in that patch mean that its original behaviour (ignore min/max values) cannot be restored. Tests on a sample set of cilium programs show no change in count of processed instructions. Fixes: `f1174f77b5` ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-08-23 22:38:08 -07:00
Edward Cree	dc503a8ad9	bpf/verifier: track liveness for pruning State of a register doesn't matter if it wasn't read in reaching an exit; a write screens off all reads downstream of it from all explored_states upstream of it. This allows us to prune many more branches; here are some processed insn counts for some Cilium programs: Program before after bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L3.o 6515 3361 bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L4.o 8976 5176 bpf_lb_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 2960 1137 bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o 95412 48537 bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 141706 78718 bpf_netdev.o 24251 17995 bpf_overlay.o 10999 9385 The runtime is also improved; here are 'time' results in ms: Program before after bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L3.o 24 6 bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L4.o 26 11 bpf_lb_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 11 2 bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o 1288 139 bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 1768 234 bpf_netdev.o 62 31 bpf_overlay.o 15 13 Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-08-15 16:32:33 -07:00
Edward Cree	b03c9f9fdc	bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values Allows us to, sometimes, combine information from a signed check of one bound and an unsigned check of the other. We now track the full range of possible values, rather than restricting ourselves to [0, 1<<30) and considering anything beyond that as unknown. While this is probably not necessary, it makes the code more straightforward and symmetrical between signed and unsigned bounds. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-08-08 17:51:34 -07:00
Edward Cree	f1174f77b5	bpf/verifier: rework value tracking Unifies adjusted and unadjusted register value types (e.g. FRAME_POINTER is now just a PTR_TO_STACK with zero offset). Tracks value alignment by means of tracking known & unknown bits. This also replaces the 'reg->imm' (leading zero bits) calculations for (what were) UNKNOWN_VALUEs. If pointer leaks are allowed, and adjust_ptr_min_max_vals returns -EACCES, treat the pointer as an unknown scalar and try again, because we might be able to conclude something about the result (e.g. pointer & 0x40 is either 0 or 0x40). Verifier hooks in the netronome/nfp driver were changed to match the new data structures. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-08-08 17:51:34 -07:00
Daniel Borkmann	4cabc5b186	bpf: fix mixed signed/unsigned derived min/max value bounds Edward reported that there's an issue in min/max value bounds tracking when signed and unsigned compares both provide hints on limits when having unknown variables. E.g. a program such as the following should have been rejected: 0: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (18) r1 = 0xffff8a94cda93400 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+7 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -16) = -8 8: (79) r1 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = -1 10: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+3 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0 R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 11: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 12: (0f) r0 += r1 13: (72) (u8 )(r0 +0) = 0 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=1 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 14: (b7) r0 = 0 15: (95) exit What happens is that in the first part ... 8: (79) r1 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = -1 10: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+3 ... r1 carries an unsigned value, and is compared as unsigned against a register carrying an immediate. Verifier deduces in reg_set_min_max() that since the compare is unsigned and operation is greater than (>), that in the fall-through/false case, r1's minimum bound must be 0 and maximum bound must be r2. Latter is larger than the bound and thus max value is reset back to being 'invalid' aka BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE. Thus, r1 state is now 'R1=inv,min_value=0'. The subsequent test ... 11: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+2 ... is a signed compare of r1 with immediate value 1. Here, verifier deduces in reg_set_min_max() that since the compare is signed this time and operation is greater than (>), that in the fall-through/false case, we can deduce that r1's maximum bound must be 1, meaning with prior test, we result in r1 having the following state: R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1. Given that the actual value this holds is -8, the bounds are wrongly deduced. When this is being added to r0 which holds the map_value(_adj) type, then subsequent store access in above case will go through check_mem_access() which invokes check_map_access_adj(), that will then probe whether the map memory is in bounds based on the min_value and max_value as well as access size since the actual unknown value is min_value <= x <= max_value; commit `fce366a9dd` ("bpf, verifier: fix alu ops against map_value{, _adj} register types") provides some more explanation on the semantics. It's worth to note in this context that in the current code, min_value and max_value tracking are used for two things, i) dynamic map value access via check_map_access_adj() and since commit `06c1c04972` ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") ii) also enforced at check_helper_mem_access() when passing a memory address (pointer to packet, map value, stack) and length pair to a helper and the length in this case is an unknown value defining an access range through min_value/max_value in that case. The min_value/max_value tracking is /not/ used in the direct packet access case to track ranges. However, the issue also affects case ii), for example, the following crafted program based on the same principle must be rejected as well: 0: (b7) r2 = 0 1: (bf) r3 = r10 2: (07) r3 += -512 3: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -16) = -8 4: (79) r4 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 5: (b7) r6 = -1 6: (2d) if r4 > r6 goto pc+5 R1=ctx R2=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0,min_align=2147483648 R3=fp-512 R4=inv,min_value=0 R6=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 7: (65) if r4 s> 0x1 goto pc+4 R1=ctx R2=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0,min_align=2147483648 R3=fp-512 R4=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R6=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 8: (07) r4 += 1 9: (b7) r5 = 0 10: (6a) (u16 )(r10 -512) = 0 11: (85) call bpf_skb_load_bytes#26 12: (b7) r0 = 0 13: (95) exit Meaning, while we initialize the max_value stack slot that the verifier thinks we access in the [1,2] range, in reality we pass -7 as length which is interpreted as u32 in the helper. Thus, this issue is relevant also for the case of helper ranges. Resetting both bounds in check_reg_overflow() in case only one of them exceeds limits is also not enough as similar test can be created that uses values which are within range, thus also here learned min value in r1 is incorrect when mixed with later signed test to create a range: 0: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (18) r1 = 0xffff880ad081fa00 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+7 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -16) = -8 8: (79) r1 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = 2 10: (3d) if r2 >= r1 goto pc+3 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 11: (65) if r1 s> 0x4 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3,max_value=4 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 12: (0f) r0 += r1 13: (72) (u8 )(r0 +0) = 0 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=4 R1=inv,min_value=3,max_value=4 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 14: (b7) r0 = 0 15: (95) exit This leaves us with two options for fixing this: i) to invalidate all prior learned information once we switch signed context, ii) to track min/max signed and unsigned boundaries separately as done in [0]. (Given latter introduces major changes throughout the whole verifier, it's rather net-next material, thus this patch follows option i), meaning we can derive bounds either from only signed tests or only unsigned tests.) There is still the case of adjust_reg_min_max_vals(), where we adjust bounds on ALU operations, meaning programs like the following where boundaries on the reg get mixed in context later on when bounds are merged on the dst reg must get rejected, too: 0: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (18) r1 = 0xffff89b2bf87ce00 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+6 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (7a) (u64 )(r10 -16) = -8 8: (79) r1 = (u64 )(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = 2 10: (3d) if r2 >= r1 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 11: (b7) r7 = 1 12: (65) if r7 s> 0x0 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=imm1,max_value=0 R10=fp 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit from 12 to 15: R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=imm1,min_value=1 R10=fp 15: (0f) r7 += r1 16: (65) if r7 s> 0x4 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=inv,min_value=4,max_value=4 R10=fp 17: (0f) r0 += r7 18: (72) (u8 )(r0 +0) = 0 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=4,max_value=4 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=inv,min_value=4,max_value=4 R10=fp 19: (b7) r0 = 0 20: (95) exit Meaning, in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() we must also reset range values on the dst when src/dst registers have mixed signed/ unsigned derived min/max value bounds with one unbounded value as otherwise they can be added together deducing false boundaries. Once both boundaries are established from either ALU ops or compare operations w/o mixing signed/unsigned insns, then they can safely be added to other regs also having both boundaries established. Adding regs with one unbounded side to a map value where the bounded side has been learned w/o mixing ops is possible, but the resulting map value won't recover from that, meaning such op is considered invalid on the time of actual access. Invalid bounds are set on the dst reg in case i) src reg, or ii) in case dst reg already had them. The only way to recover would be to perform i) ALU ops but only 'add' is allowed on map value types or ii) comparisons, but these are disallowed on pointers in case they span a range. This is fine as only BPF_JEQ and BPF_JNE may be performed on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers which potentially turn them into PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE type depending on the branch, so only here min/max value cannot be invalidated for them. In terms of state pruning, value_from_signed is considered as well in states_equal() when dealing with adjusted map values. With regards to breaking existing programs, there is a small risk, but use-cases are rather quite narrow where this could occur and mixing compares probably unlikely. Joint work with Josef and Edward. [0] https://lists.iovisor.org/pipermail/iovisor-dev/2017-June/000822.html Fixes: `484611357c` ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Reported-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-07-20 15:20:27 -07:00
Yonghong Song	239946314e	bpf: possibly avoid extra masking for narrower load in verifier Commit `31fd85816d` ("bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields") permits narrower load for certain ctx fields. The commit however will already generate a masking even if the prog-specific ctx conversion produces the result with narrower size. For example, for __sk_buff->protocol, the ctx conversion loads the data into register with 2-byte load. A narrower 2-byte load should not generate masking. For __sk_buff->vlan_present, the conversion function set the result as either 0 or 1, essentially a byte. The narrower 2-byte or 1-byte load should not generate masking. To avoid unnecessary masking, prog-specific _is_valid_access now passes converted_op_size back to verifier, which indicates the valid data width after perceived future conversion. Based on this information, verifier is able to avoid unnecessary marking. Since we want more information back from prog-specific _is_valid_access checking, all of them are packed into one data structure for more clarity. Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-06-23 14:04:11 -04:00
Yonghong Song	31fd85816d	bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields Currently, verifier will reject a program if it contains an narrower load from the bpf context structure. For example, __u8 h = __sk_buff->hash, or __u16 p = __sk_buff->protocol __u32 sample_period = bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period which are narrower loads of 4-byte or 8-byte field. This patch solves the issue by: . Introduce a new parameter ctx_field_size to carry the field size of narrower load from prog type specific *__is_valid_access validator back to verifier. . The non-zero ctx_field_size for a memory access indicates (1). underlying prog type specific convert_ctx_accesses supporting non-whole-field access (2). the current insn is a narrower or whole field access. . In verifier, for such loads where load memory size is less than ctx_field_size, verifier transforms it to a full field load followed by proper masking. . Currently, __sk_buff and bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period are supporting narrowing loads. . Narrower stores are still not allowed as typical ctx stores are just normal stores. Because of this change, some tests in verifier will fail and these tests are removed. As a bonus, rename some out of bound __sk_buff->cb access to proper field name and remove two redundant "skb cb oob" tests. Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-06-14 14:56:25 -04:00
David S. Miller	e07b98d9bf	bpf: Add strict alignment flag for BPF_PROG_LOAD. Add a new field, "prog_flags", and an initial flag value BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT. When set, the verifier will enforce strict pointer alignment regardless of the setting of CONFIG_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. The verifier, in this mode, will also use a fixed value of "2" in place of NET_IP_ALIGN. This facilitates test cases that will exercise and validate this part of the verifier even when run on architectures where alignment doesn't matter. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-05-11 14:19:00 -04:00
David S. Miller	d117441674	bpf: Track alignment of register values in the verifier. Currently if we add only constant values to pointers we can fully validate the alignment, and properly check if we need to reject the program on !CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS architectures. However, once an unknown value is introduced we only allow byte sized memory accesses which is too restrictive. Add logic to track the known minimum alignment of register values, and propagate this state into registers containing pointers. The most common paradigm that makes use of this new logic is computing the transport header using the IP header length field. For example: struct ethhdr ep = skb->data; struct iphdr iph = (struct iphdr ) (ep + 1); struct tcphdr th; ... n = iph->ihl; th = ((void )iph + (n 4)); port = th->dest; The existing code will reject the load of th->dest because it cannot validate that the alignment is at least 2 once "n * 4" is added the the packet pointer. In the new code, the register holding "n * 4" will have a reg->min_align value of 4, because any value multiplied by 4 will be at least 4 byte aligned. (actually, the eBPF code emitted by the compiler in this case is most likely to use a shift left by 2, but the end result is identical) At the critical addition: th = ((void )iph + (n 4)); The register holding 'th' will start with reg->off value of 14. The pointer addition will transform that reg into something that looks like: reg->aux_off = 14 reg->aux_off_align = 4 Next, the verifier will look at the th->dest load, and it will see a load offset of 2, and first check: if (reg->aux_off_align % size) which will pass because aux_off_align is 4. reg_off will be computed: reg_off = reg->off; ... reg_off += reg->aux_off; plus we have off==2, and it will thus check: if ((NET_IP_ALIGN + reg_off + off) % size != 0) which evaluates to: if ((NET_IP_ALIGN + 14 + 2) % size != 0) On strict alignment architectures, NET_IP_ALIGN is 2, thus: if ((2 + 14 + 2) % size != 0) which passes. These pointer transformations and checks work regardless of whether the constant offset or the variable with known alignment is added first to the pointer register. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>	2017-05-11 14:19:00 -04:00
Alexei Starovoitov	81ed18ab30	bpf: add helper inlining infra and optimize map_array lookup Optimize bpf_call -> bpf_map_lookup_elem() -> array_map_lookup_elem() into a sequence of bpf instructions. When JIT is on the sequence of bpf instructions is the sequence of native cpu instructions with significantly faster performance than indirect call and two function's prologue/epilogue. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2017-03-16 20:44:11 -07:00
Alexei Starovoitov	d2a4dd37f6	bpf: fix state equivalence Commmits `57a09bf0a4` ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers") and `484611357c` ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") by themselves are correct, but in combination they make state equivalence ignore 'id' field of the register state which can lead to accepting invalid program. Fixes: `57a09bf0a4` ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers") Fixes: `484611357c` ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2016-12-08 13:31:11 -05:00
David S. Miller	f9aa9dc7d2	Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net All conflicts were simple overlapping changes except perhaps for the Thunder driver. That driver has a change_mtu method explicitly for sending a message to the hardware. If that fails it returns an error. Normally a driver doesn't need an ndo_change_mtu method becuase those are usually just range changes, which are now handled generically. But since this extra operation is needed in the Thunder driver, it has to stay. However, if the message send fails we have to restore the original MTU before the change because the entire call chain expects that if an error is thrown by ndo_change_mtu then the MTU did not change. Therefore code is added to nicvf_change_mtu to remember the original MTU, and to restore it upon nicvf_update_hw_max_frs() failue. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	2016-11-22 13:27:16 -05:00

1 2

55 Commits