vmlinux.lds.h: Create section for protection against instrumentation

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

commit 6553896666433e7efec589838b400a2a652b3ffa upstream.

Some code pathes, especially the low level entry code, must be protected
against instrumentation for various reasons:

 - Low level entry code can be a fragile beast, especially on x86.

 - With NO_HZ_FULL RCU state needs to be established before using it.

Having a dedicated section for such code allows to validate with tooling
that no unsafe functions are invoked.

Add the .noinstr.text section and the noinstr attribute to mark
functions. noinstr implies notrace. Kprobes will gain a section check
later.

Provide also a set of markers: instrumentation_begin()/end()

These are used to mark code inside a noinstr function which calls
into regular instrumentable text section as safe.

The instrumentation markers are only active when CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY is
enabled as the end marker emits a NOP to prevent the compiler from merging
the annotation points. This means the objtool verification requires a
kernel compiled with this option.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.075416272@linutronix.de

[Nicolas:
Guard noinstr macro in include/linux/compiler_types.h in __KERNEL__
&& !__ASSEMBLY__, otherwise noinstr is expanded in the linker
script construct.

Upstream does not have this problem as many macros were moved by
commit 71391bdd2e9a ("include/linux/compiler_types.h: don't pollute
userspace with macro definitions"). We take the minimal approach here
and just guard the new macro.

Minor context conflicts in:
	arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
	include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
	include/linux/compiler.h]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

include/linux/compiler.h

@@ -129,11 +129,65 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
 	".pushsection .discard.unreachable\n\t"				\
 	".long 999b - .\n\t"						\
 	".popsection\n\t"
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
+/* Begin/end of an instrumentation safe region */
+#define instrumentation_begin() ({					\
+	asm volatile("%c0:\n\t"						\
+		     ".pushsection .discard.instr_begin\n\t"		\
+		     ".long %c0b - .\n\t"				\
+		     ".popsection\n\t" : : "i" (__COUNTER__));		\
+})
+
+/*
+ * Because instrumentation_{begin,end}() can nest, objtool validation considers
+ * _begin() a +1 and _end() a -1 and computes a sum over the instructions.
+ * When the value is greater than 0, we consider instrumentation allowed.
+ *
+ * There is a problem with code like:
+ *
+ * noinstr void foo()
+ * {
+ *	instrumentation_begin();
+ *	...
+ *	if (cond) {
+ *		instrumentation_begin();
+ *		...
+ *		instrumentation_end();
+ *	}
+ *	bar();
+ *	instrumentation_end();
+ * }
+ *
+ * If instrumentation_end() would be an empty label, like all the other
+ * annotations, the inner _end(), which is at the end of a conditional block,
+ * would land on the instruction after the block.
+ *
+ * If we then consider the sum of the !cond path, we'll see that the call to
+ * bar() is with a 0-value, even though, we meant it to happen with a positive
+ * value.
+ *
+ * To avoid this, have _end() be a NOP instruction, this ensures it will be
+ * part of the condition block and does not escape.
+ */
+#define instrumentation_end() ({					\
+	asm volatile("%c0: nop\n\t"					\
+		     ".pushsection .discard.instr_end\n\t"		\
+		     ".long %c0b - .\n\t"				\
+		     ".popsection\n\t" : : "i" (__COUNTER__));		\
+})
+#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY */
+
 #else
 #define annotate_reachable()
 #define annotate_unreachable()
 #endif
 
+#ifndef instrumentation_begin
+#define instrumentation_begin()		do { } while(0)
+#define instrumentation_end()		do { } while(0)
+#endif
+
 #ifndef ASM_UNREACHABLE
 # define ASM_UNREACHABLE
 #endif